Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Jacob – an ambiguous portrayal of an ‘idiot’

Simon Jarrett argues that George Eliot’s loveable but pitchfork-wielding ‘idiot’ Jacob represents a challenge to social progress in the mid-nineteenth century.

 

Brother Jacob

By George Eliot

Published 1860 (43 pages)

 

George Eliot published her novella Brother Jacob in 1860 at a time of great social change. A new class of tradesmen and small-business people were challenging the traditional power of the land-owning classes and new ways of capitalist thinking were dominating society.

 

Radical thinker

Eliot herself was part of this process of change. As a woman writer, intellectual and radical political thinker, she believed that her writing would not be taken seriously by male society and therefore swapped her real name of Mary Ann Evans for the masculine pen name of George Eliot.

 

In this context she told the story of Jacob, ‘a very healthy and well-developed idiot,’ one of seven sons of a modest, rural family.

 

Jacob is very large, wears a smock and carries a large pitchfork, in a classic representation of the ‘village idiot’. His wicked brother David dreams of starting a confectionary shop, selling delicacies to the booming, consumer-oriented middle class. Planning first to make his fortune in the West Indies, he steals the few guineas his mother has saved over the years.

 

Almost foiled by Jacob, who surprises him in the act of burying the money prior to fleeing the family home, David only escapes by convincing him he is burying the guineas so that they will grow as sweets.

 

Years later David returns to England with a false, aristocratic identity and a modest fortune, to open a confectionary shop in a nearby town. The shop is successful but his plans to marry into a wealthy merchant family are foiled by his idiot brother. Jacob bursts into the shop one day, terrifying David’s future wife and prospective in-laws. Stuffing himself with David’s magnificent pies and sweets and never letting go of his pitchfork, he hugs David and tells the in-laws that this is his brother ‘Zavy’ who has come back from the Indies with his mother’s ‘zinnies’ (guineas), now grown into the sweets he sees before him.

 

David’s deception is unmasked and he is jeered out of the village, his business ruined.

 

Jacob is in some ways a classically ambiguous Victorian portrayal of an idiot. He is endearingly innocent and gullible but alongside this loveable simplicity lie his dangerousness, his menacing pitchfork, and his propensity to violence if thwarted in his animal desires. His innocence and truthfulness unmask the manipulations of his evil brother.

 

New capitalism

Yet Jacob represents something else. The confectionary shop changes the town. Housewives and maids no longer cook but buy luxurious prepared foods. This leaves them, dangerously, with time on their hands. The new capitalism represents a threat to the social order and challenges assumptions about the place of women. The actions of the simpleton Jacob restore the old order. The shop closes and the women start to cook again.

 

For Eliot Jacob may represent a loveable, traditional past, but he is also a threat to progress with his obstinate, timeless, unchanging ways.